Overview
The CAT 320 and Komatsu PC210 sit in the same medium crawler class, separated by 1.5 tonnes of operating weight. Both are positioned in the premium segment, which means the choice between them turns less on brand reputation and more on configuration fit, parts logistics, and operator preference.
Caterpillar 320 buyers across our Caribbean and African service area typically choose it for mid-class construction, road building, and quarry operations. Komatsu PC210 buyers, by contrast, tend to prioritise 21-tonne general construction and earthmoving. The two machines have meaningful overlap on general construction-sector work, so a buyer with that application profile genuinely has a choice to make — and it's worth understanding the trade-offs in depth before committing.
Brand positioning
Caterpillar positioning
Caterpillar is the global benchmark — strongest parts logistics across our Caribbean and African service area, highest resale value retention, and the safest single-machine purchase decision for buyers prioritising uptime over upfront price.
Komatsu positioning
Komatsu is the segment's fuel-efficiency leader and a close second to Caterpillar on global parts availability. The SAA engine family delivers consistently better real-world fuel consumption than competing premium engines.
5-year total cost of ownership
Across a 5-year ownership cycle at typical African construction-sector use (2,000 operating hours/year, $1.20/L diesel, financed 50%), the CAT 320 typically delivers a total 5-year operating cost of $580-650k including acquisition, fuel, parts, service, financing interest, and resale recovery. The Komatsu PC210 comes in at $580-650k.
Acquisition (financed): Caterpillar 320 ~$160-220k, Komatsu PC210 ~$160-220k. Comparable upfront.
Fuel over 5 years: Both machines burn 20-30 L/h on standard duty. Across 10,000 lifetime operating hours that's $240-360k of diesel. The Komatsu PC210 typically delivers 5-10% better real-world fuel economy than competing mid-class machines, saving $12-36k over the cycle.
Parts + service: Premium-tier parts run ~$14-18k/year for the CAT 320. Premium-tier parts run ~$14-18k/year for the Komatsu PC210.
Resale at year 5: Caterpillar typically holds 45-55% of acquisition price after 5 years. Komatsu holds 45-55%. The resale gap is often the largest single TCO swing factor — premium-tier machines effectively rebate 15-25% more capital at year five.
Parts logistics & service support
Caterpillar parts logistics for CAT 320
Tractafric (Ghana, Cameroon), Mantrac (Tanzania, Kenya, Egypt, Nigeria), Bia (West Africa), Empresa Cubana de Maquinaria across the Caribbean — easily the strongest dealer network of any brand. Fast-moving wearing parts typically available within 24-72 hours; major components 1-3 weeks.
Komatsu parts logistics for Komatsu PC210
Komatsu direct dealers across South Africa, Kenya, Tanzania, Ghana, and Nigeria. Strong East African parts logistics in particular. Fast-moving parts within 48-96 hours; major components 2-3 weeks.
What this means in practice
Mining and infrastructure operations across Caribbean and African markets typically lose $2-5k per hour of unscheduled downtime — meaning a single 24-hour parts delay can cost more than the parts themselves. Choose the brand with the strongest parts logistics in your destination country and operating sector.
Configurations available
CAT 320 configurations available
- 320 (standard) — Standard configuration for general excavation and construction
- 320 GC — Cost-optimised newer-generation variant for mid-tier contractors
Komatsu PC210 configurations available
- PC210 (standard) — Standard production configuration
Configuration choice (undercarriage track pattern, bucket capacity, hydraulic-circuit options, cab certification) drives 30%+ of total cost of ownership over a 5-year cycle. Whichever model you choose, specify configuration to the buyer's actual operating profile before order — retrofitting later costs 30-50% more.