Suriname Excavators logo
Suriname Excavators
Side-by-side comparison · medium crawler

CAT 320 vs Volvo EC220E

22.5t CAT vs 22t Volvo — full spec showdown, application fit, and our recommendation by project type.

22.5t / 22t
Operating weight
Engine power
2 / 1
Configurations
5 / 3
Applications
Visual comparison

Side-by-side spec bars

Operating weight
32022.5t
EC220E22t
Max dig depth
3206.7 m (22 ft)
EC220E6.78 m
Max reach
3209.9 m
EC220E9.81 m
Bucket capacity
3200.9–1.2 m³ (configurable)
EC220E1.00 m³

Overview

The CAT 320 and Volvo EC220E sit in the same medium crawler class, separated by less than a tonne of operating weight. Both are positioned in the premium segment, which means the choice between them turns less on brand reputation and more on configuration fit, parts logistics, and operator preference.

Caterpillar 320 buyers across our Caribbean and African service area typically choose it for mid-class construction, road building, and quarry operations. Volvo Construction Equipment EC220E buyers, by contrast, tend to prioritise 22-tonne volvo standard mid-class. The two machines have meaningful overlap on general excavation, so a buyer with that application profile genuinely has a choice to make — and it's worth understanding the trade-offs in depth before committing.

Brand positioning

Caterpillar positioning

Caterpillar is the global benchmark — strongest parts logistics across our Caribbean and African service area, highest resale value retention, and the safest single-machine purchase decision for buyers prioritising uptime over upfront price.

Volvo Construction Equipment positioning

Volvo CE leads the segment on fuel efficiency thanks to the Volvo D-series engines and ECO mode. Strong African direct-dealer presence; particularly competitive in South Africa, Kenya, and West African construction markets.

5-year total cost of ownership

Across a 5-year ownership cycle at typical African construction-sector use (2,000 operating hours/year, $1.20/L diesel, financed 50%), the CAT 320 typically delivers a total 5-year operating cost of $580-650k including acquisition, fuel, parts, service, financing interest, and resale recovery. The Volvo EC220E comes in at $580-650k.

Acquisition (financed): Caterpillar 320 ~$160-220k, Volvo Construction Equipment EC220E ~$160-220k. Comparable upfront.

Fuel over 5 years: Both machines burn 20-30 L/h on standard duty. Across 10,000 lifetime operating hours that's $240-360k of diesel. The Volvo EC220E typically delivers 5-10% better real-world fuel economy than competing mid-class machines, saving $12-36k over the cycle.

Parts + service: Premium-tier parts run ~$14-18k/year for the CAT 320. Premium-tier parts run ~$14-18k/year for the Volvo EC220E.

Resale at year 5: Caterpillar typically holds 45-55% of acquisition price after 5 years. Volvo Construction Equipment holds 45-55%. The resale gap is often the largest single TCO swing factor — premium-tier machines effectively rebate 15-25% more capital at year five.

Parts logistics & service support

Caterpillar parts logistics for CAT 320

Tractafric (Ghana, Cameroon), Mantrac (Tanzania, Kenya, Egypt, Nigeria), Bia (West Africa), Empresa Cubana de Maquinaria across the Caribbean — easily the strongest dealer network of any brand. Fast-moving wearing parts typically available within 24-72 hours; major components 1-3 weeks.

Volvo Construction Equipment parts logistics for Volvo EC220E

Volvo CE Africa with direct South African operations and reseller presence in major African markets. Fast-moving parts 3-7 days; major components 2-4 weeks.

What this means in practice

Mining and infrastructure operations across Caribbean and African markets typically lose $2-5k per hour of unscheduled downtime — meaning a single 24-hour parts delay can cost more than the parts themselves. Choose the brand with the strongest parts logistics in your destination country and operating sector.

Configurations available

CAT 320 configurations available

  • 320 (standard) — Standard configuration for general excavation and construction
  • 320 GC — Cost-optimised newer-generation variant for mid-tier contractors

Volvo EC220E configurations available

  • EC220E (standard) — Standard production configuration

Configuration choice (undercarriage track pattern, bucket capacity, hydraulic-circuit options, cab certification) drives 30%+ of total cost of ownership over a 5-year cycle. Whichever model you choose, specify configuration to the buyer's actual operating profile before order — retrofitting later costs 30-50% more.

Specs

Side-by-side spec table

FeatureCAT 320Volvo EC220E
Operating weight22.5 tonnes (49,600 lbs)22 tonnes
Engine powerCat C4.4 ACERT — 25% more fuel efficient than 320FVolvo D6 Tier 4F — 174 hp
Bucket capacity0.9–1.2 m³ (configurable)1.00 m³
Max dig depth6.7 m (22 ft)6.78 m
Max reach9.9 m9.81 m
Weight classmedium crawlermedium crawler
Configurations2 variants1 variant
Which to choose

Recommendation by project profile

Applications

Where each model excels

CAT 320 applications
  • General excavation
  • Foundation digging
  • Road construction
  • Quarry work
  • Site preparation
Volvo EC220E applications
  • General excavation
  • Foundation work
  • Quarry preparation
Availability

Both models available across our service area

Frequently asked

Buyer questions

Which is better — CAT 320 or Volvo EC220E?

Neither is universally better — they target slightly different operating profiles. The CAT 320 is best for mid-class construction, road building, and quarry operations. The Volvo EC220E is best for 22-tonne volvo standard mid-class. Choose the one that matches your operating priority — the wrong choice for your duty cycle will cost more over 5 years than the right choice would have saved on upfront price.

What's the price difference between the CAT 320 and Volvo EC220E?

Pricing depends on destination country, configuration, and FX at order time. Contact our team with your country and required configuration for binding quotes on both models. Typically comparable.

How long does delivery of either to Caribbean and Africa take?

Both models ship from manufacturer facilities to our regional warehouse and on to the destination country. Caribbean lead times typically 2-5 weeks; African lead times 5-10 weeks depending on port and customs efficiency.

Do you offer financing for the CAT 320 and Volvo EC220E?

Yes. Both Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment machines can be financed via manufacturer-backed credit programmes (where applicable), regional commercial bank facilities, or lease-to-own structures. Typical terms are 24-60 months. Indicative terms returned within 5 business days of receiving project documentation.

Which holds better resale value — CAT 320 or Volvo EC220E?

Comparable resale value retention — both typically hold 45-55% of acquisition price after 5 years.

What configurations should I specify for CAT 320 or Volvo EC220E in mining operations?

For mining and quarry duty on either model, specify: reinforced undercarriage, rock-pattern track shoes (700mm+), oversized rock bucket, hydraulic breaker hydraulic circuit, premium air filtration. Order at point of sale — retrofitting these costs 30-50% more.

Are parts readily available for the CAT 320 and Volvo EC220E across Africa?

Yes — both brands have meaningful African dealer presence. CAT fast-moving parts typically 24-72 hours; Volvo fast-moving parts 24-72 hours. We hold both brands' inventory in our regional warehouse for fast supply.

Can I get an operator trained on the CAT 320 or Volvo EC220E?

Yes. Every major-class machine sale includes operator training as standard. Manufacturer-certified training is also available through Caterpillar and Volvo Construction Equipment dealer networks in most major Caribbean and African markets.

Continue comparing

Related head-to-head comparisons

Cite this page
APA
Suriname Excavators. (2026). CAT 320 vs Volvo EC220E — Comparison. Retrieved 10 June 2026, from https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/cat-320-vs-volvo-ec220e
MLA
"CAT 320 vs Volvo EC220E — Comparison." Suriname Excavators, 10 June 2026, https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/cat-320-vs-volvo-ec220e.
Chicago
Suriname Excavators. "CAT 320 vs Volvo EC220E — Comparison." Accessed 10 June 2026. https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/cat-320-vs-volvo-ec220e.
BibTeX
@misc{surinameexcavators__compare_cat_320_vs_volvo_ec220e,
  title = {CAT 320 vs Volvo EC220E — Comparison},
  author = {Suriname Excavators},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/cat-320-vs-volvo-ec220e},
  note = {Accessed: 10 June 2026}
}
Contact to request a price

Need help choosing — 320 or EC220E?

Share your country, project profile, and tonnage requirement. Our team will recommend the right machine and send a tailored quote within one business day.

Email us

Quick quote request

We respond within one business day.

We respond within one business day. No price displayed online — every quote is tailored to your project, tonnage, and delivery country.